Protect Your Investment. Maximize Portfolio Value.

Independent technical due diligence and strategic CTO support for PE/VC firms evaluating and managing technology companies.

Recent work: technology readiness for a $600M+ strategic exit.

The Problem

Most PE/VC firms lack deep technical expertise to evaluate acquisition targets. They rely on the target company's own team to assess technology risk — a clear conflict of interest. That leaves you exposed to hidden technical debt, security gaps, scalability limits, and team capability issues that only surface after the deal closes.

What I Deliver

  • Pre-acquisition technical due diligence (architecture, security, scalability, team assessment)
  • Post-acquisition technology leadership for portfolio companies
  • CTO search support and interim technology leadership during transitions
  • Technology value creation roadmaps for portfolio companies

Case Study: Technology Readiness for a $600M Exit

A PE-backed platform was preparing for a strategic sale north of $600M. The investment thesis depended on consolidating fragmented vendor technology into a single, scalable platform — but there were unanswered questions around architecture, security posture, and the team's ability to support the next stage of growth.

I partnered with management and the sponsor to turn technology from a diligence risk into a deal enabler: aligning the roadmap to the value-creation plan, tightening operational discipline, and building the narrative and artifacts buyers would expect to see in a competitive process.

  • Defined and executed a technology and adoption growth plan that supported aggressive GMV and margin targets without compromising reliability or security.
  • Restructured ownership across a fractured vendor ecosystem into a single accountable platform team with clear SLAs, incident response, and change control.
  • Prepared buyer-ready materials: architecture maps, risk register, remediation roadmap, and data-driven KPIs that spoke directly to investment committee concerns.
  • Supported management through multiple rounds of technical Q&A and reverse diligence, with no material technology issues flagged as deal blockers.

Why Me

I'm currently serving as CTO for a platform undergoing active M&A due diligence — I understand both sides of the table. My environment is SOC 2 Type II certified. I have hands-on experience with AWS GovCloud and FedRAMP. That means I can assess technology risk, team capability, and integration complexity with the same lens your target's next CTO would use.

I don't just review slides. I review architecture, code quality, security posture, and organizational health. You get an executive-ready report with a risk matrix, recommendations, and effort estimates — so you can make informed investment decisions.

Portfolio Company Advisory

Due diligence is a point-in-time assessment. The real value is created — or destroyed — in the years that follow. I work with GPs as a long-term, equity-aligned partner to help portfolio companies turn technology into a source of durable value, not a hidden liability.

For a select set of portfolio companies, I provide ongoing CTO-level advisory and embedded support: working directly with founders, CTOs, and technology leaders to execute on the value-creation plan, de-risk major initiatives, and build teams and architecture that can withstand the next round of diligence.

  • Monthly strategy sessions with CEOs/CTOs plus asynchronous access for time-sensitive decisions.
  • Architecture, security, and team roadmaps tied directly to the fund's value-creation thesis for each asset.
  • Support for critical board and IC conversations where technology risk, spend, or execution is a central question.
  • Engagements with PE/VC portfolio companies are structured to include equity or co-investment rights where appropriate, aligning incentives around long-term outcomes.

What I Look For Before Saying Yes to a Portfolio Company

For GPs, the most important question isn't just whether a portfolio company has a technology problem — it's whether it has a technology leadership problem. In this piece, I walk through how I evaluate potential portfolio engagements, why I structure my work around equity rather than billable hours, and what actually makes a technical advisory relationship valuable at the fund level.

Read the full article on Substack

Engagement Model

Technical Due Diligence per transaction with optional Portfolio Technology Partner retainers for ongoing fund coverage. Scope and artifacts are defined upfront. No hourly surprises.